Umělec magazine 2002/3 >> Forgotten Genius of Czech Art List of all editions.
Umělec magazine
Year 2002, 3
6,50 EUR
7 USD
Send the printed edition:
Order subscription

Forgotten Genius of Czech Art

Umělec magazine 2002/3

01.03.2002

Tomáš Pospiszyl | focus | en cs

Zdeněk Burian is a remarkable artist who has yet to receive satisfactory acclaim for all the aspects of his rich oeuvre. There is perhaps no other artist who contributed more to the idea of what visual art looks like. Serious art historians turn their noses up at the adventure illustrator. Burian’s hard-core fans on the other hand lack the necessary distance and ability to place his work in a broader art and cultural historical context. The future will show that Burian is perhaps a little quaint, but nevertheless one of the most interesting Czech artists of the 20th century. His work is an ideal combination of such diverse artistic personalities as Max Švabinský, Josef Lada, and Jan Čumpelík. Burian represents a remarkable illustration of the fate of realistic painting in the world of modern art.
Thanks to his unusual talent at capturing the surrounding world, Zdeněk Burian was considered a wunderkind. He studied at Švabinský’s studio at the Prague Academy of Fine Arts. When it was discovered that he was making money on the side with commercial illustration, he was expelled from the school. Many parallels between the work of Švabinský and Burian may be found, as the student tried to live up to the work of his teacher. The similarities are apparent comparing Švabinský’s woodcarvings and paintings with exotic themes and Burian’s best illustrations in Kipling’s The Jungle Book and Stories of a Tiger Baby by D. G. Mukerdgie.
Zdeněk Burian had a phenomenal photographic memory and was able to realistically capture scenes never seen before using gouache and oil painting. He intentionally complemented many of his adventure illustrations and primeval scenes with elements typical of painting after photography in order to enhance their authenticity. It is surprising that this naturalism or super-realism so irritated theorists of socialist realism in the 1950s. His ability to capture the most important moment of a story, which would effectively point back to the text, and the fact that most of his work was predestined to mechanical reproduction in books and magazines bring him closer to the Soviet masters of socialist realism and the American illustrator Norman Rockwell.
Burian’s prehistoric reconstructions form a special category of his work. They represent an ideal of “scientific” painting taken to perfection combining art and paleontology, biology and other fields. On the one hand, Burian managed to perfectly imitate the look and texture of materials and on the other, he arranged his dramatic scenes in somewhat stiff compositions, sort of scenographic models of
real events. Prehistoric constructions made for teaching purposes are directly reminiscent of those charts of revived animal species, in which extinct animals form harmonic groups of long defunct ecosystems.





01.03.2002

Comments

There are currently no comments.

Add new comment

Recommended articles

Tunelling Culture II Tunelling Culture II
Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism
Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene…
African Vampires in the Age of Globalisation African Vampires in the Age of Globalisation
"In Cameroon, rumours abound of zombie-labourers toiling on invisible plantations in an obscure night-time economy."
Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism
Nick Land was a British philosopher but is no longer, though he is not dead. The almost neurotic fervor with which he scratched at the scars of reality has seduced more than a few promising academics onto the path of art that offends in its originality. The texts that he has left behind are reliably revolting and boring, and impel us to castrate their categorization as “mere” literature.