Revista Umělec 2002/3 >> Live Broadcast Lista de todas las ediciones
Revista Umělec
Año 2002, 3
6,50 EUR
7 USD
Enviar la edición impresa:
Suscripción de orden

Live Broadcast

Revista Umělec 2002/3

01.03.2002

Tomáš Pospiszyl | focus | en cs

"The documentary “The Scandal of Amazona” was the work of scriptwriter Jiří Martin and director František Arlet. With typical demagogy, the program concealed many facts and blamed international imperialism or the British secret service. But Burian and Konečný’s interesting statements made up the bulk of the show. In one sequence, Konečný flipped through the book feigning surprise over images that he must have known for at least three years. “This is preposterous,” Konečný said. “I made this, but all the other things are added. All those symbols. The rest is different and made by somebody else. Jesus Christ! Well, this now … None of us has anything to do with this. We called it — the sequels we made for the commission — Amazona. This is awful, it’s dreadful. What a bastard! This is unbelievable.”
The commentary for the program said: “The painters obeyed [Sadecký] completely. We live in a time when it’s fashionable to look up to the West and sell behind the borders rather than at home; to break through in a world where they don’t talk about the artist’s consciousness related to society, where freedom of creation rules and nobody asks anybody whether this or that corresponds with morale or taste. ‘Kitsch or not, taste or not; forget about socialist morale, so long as it makes money and the accounts fill up with marks, pounds and dollars instead of crowns.’ So they drew without constraint, just to make it there, to be famous in Western circles. And Sadecký is in a hurry: ‘Now is the time to make it in the Western markets. God knows what will happen next year.’”
“I considered him my own son, I’d almost say,” Konečný said. “But after what he’s doing today... No, not today; he obviously prepared this much earlier. I think this is the lowest thing a person can do.”
"





Comentarios

Actualmente no hay comentarios

Agregar nuevo comentario

Artículos recomendados

Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism
Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene…
Le Dernier Cri and the black penis of Marseille Le Dernier Cri and the black penis of Marseille
We’re constantly hearing that someone would like to do some joint project, organize something together, some event, but… damn, how to put it... we really like what you’re doing but it might piss someone off back home. Sure, it’s true that every now and then someone gets kicked out of this institution or that institute for organizing something with Divus, but weren’t they actually terribly self…
Intoxicated by Media Déjà-vu / Notes on Oliver Pietsche"s Image Strategy Intoxicated by Media Déjà-vu / Notes on Oliver Pietsche"s Image Strategy
Goff & Rosenthal gallery, Berlin, November 18 - December 30, 2006 Society permanently renegotiates the definition of drugs and our relationship towards them. In his forty-five minute found-footage film The Conquest of Happiness, produced in 2005, Oliver Pietsch, a Berlin-based video artist, demonstrates which drugs society can accommodate, which it cannot, and how the story of the drugs can be…
No Future For Censorship No Future For Censorship
Author dreaming of a future without censorship we have never got rid of. It seems, that people don‘t care while it grows stronger again.